Legal Opinion

610 CONVENIENCE STORE & DELI V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 19, 2020No. 3:19-cv-17309Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 610 CONVENIENCE STORE & DELI, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 19-17309 v. OPINION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. THOMPSON, U.S.D.J. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant United States of America (“Defendant”). (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff 610 Convenience Store (“Plaintiff” or the “Store”) does not oppose. The Court has decided the Motion based on the written submissions of the parties and without oral argument, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 78.1(b). For the reasons…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Bonnco Petrol, Inc. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. E. R. Redmond D/B/A Arcola Food Market v. United States of America and United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API