Legal Opinion

Flansburg v. Giza

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 1969No. 41222PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

A disputed construction of the so-called “second injury” provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act is presented for resolution by certiorari to review an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission. Minn. St. 176.131 provides:

“Subdivision 1. If an employee incurs personal injury and suffers disability that is substantially greater, because of a preexisting physical impairment, than what would have resulted from the personal injury alone, the employer shall pay all compensation provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 176, but he shall be reimbursed from the special…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Norris v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jewison v. Frerichs ConstructionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Olson v. Midwest Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. DeHaan v. Farmers Union Marketing & Processing Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Tuomela v. Reserve Mining CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API