Legal Opinion

Tuomela v. Reserve Mining Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1974No. 44063PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator-employer, Reserve Mining Company, by writ of certiorari seeks review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission denying relator’s claim for reimbursement from the Special Compensation Fund pursuant to Minn. St. 176.131, subd. 1. We affirm.

While employed by relator, Robert Tuomela sustained a work-connected leg injury in 1956. In 1968, while still employed by relator, Tuomela suffered a back injury. Relator, a self-insurer, contends that, because of the preexisting leg injury, Tuomela suffered a substantially greater disability in 1968 than he would have from the subsequent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Strei v. Church of St. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. State v. DaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Luthens v. Glencoe Red & White StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Flansburg v. GizaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. v. Subsequent Injury FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Reed v. United Van Bus DeliverySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API