Legal Opinion

Jewison v. Frerichs Construction

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1989No. C9-88-1293PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Justice.

A petition to discontinue workers’ compensation benefits and a claim for reimbursement was filed by employer Frerichs Construction and insurer Aetna Casualty Company against a former employee, Edward 0. Jewison. The compensation judge issued findings and an order denying the petition on the ground there was no causal connection between misrepresentations Jewison made on a pre-employment application regarding his previous injuries and the injury he suffered while employed by Fre-richs. The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (“WCCA”) affirmed the compensation judge’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Martin Company v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. Shippers Transport of Georgia v. SteppSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Federal Copper & Aluminum Company v. DickeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. DelgiaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Oesterreich v. Canton-Inwood HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ex Parte Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Sanchez v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Huisenga v. Opus Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API