Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Superior Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1911No. 16,794PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Elk district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover a balance-claimed to be due for transporting oil from Bartlesville, Okla., to Longton, Kan., according to the rates; fixed in its freight tariffs on file at the time with the: *733interstate commerce commission and posted and published as required by the federal law. The plaintiff recovered.

The trial was upon an agreed statement, from which it appears that the plaintiff’s duly established and published rate for the transportation of oil from Bartlesville to Chanute, Humboldt, Erie, and Cherryvale, all on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. New Era Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amundson & Associates Art Studio, Ltd. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
  2. Schenberger v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Kanotex Refining Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. McNabbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API