Schenberger v. Union Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Clay district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Benson, J.:
This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff by reason of the false and fraudulent statements of its freight agent that the rate for the transportation of wheat in carload lots from Wakefield, Kan., to New Braunfels, Tex., was 31 cents per hundredweight, when in fact the regular rate was 431/2 cents per hundredweight, whereby the plaintiff suffered damages in the sum of *80$150.25, being the difference between the rate quoted and the regular rate charged upon two cars of wheat ■sold and shipped in reliance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. HefleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Superior Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amundson & Associates Art Studio, Ltd. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
- Denver and Rio Grande Western R. Co. v. MartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Frye & Bruhn, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co. v. Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.