Kanotex Refining Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This was an action to recover damages growing out of a contract for the establishment of a freight rate.
There is no dispute as to the facts. The petition disclosed that plaintiff operated an oil refinery at Arkansas City, and in July, 1931, it had an opportunity to purchase 368 carloads of crude oil at Oklahoma City, Okla. Although not disclosed fully by the pleadings, it seems conceded that there was a published rate on file with *140the interstate commerce commission under which it was determinable the rate from Oklahoma City to Arkansas City…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hush v. ReederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Union Transfer Co. v. RenstromNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Louisville & N. R. v. Black Creek Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Graves Truck Line, Inc. v. Hy Plains Dressed Beef, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969