Legal Opinion
United States v. Dusenbery
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 28, 1998No. 5:91-cr-00291PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
In 1990 and 1992, the government obtained administrative civil forfeiture of several pieces of property ostensibly owned by defendant Larry Dusenbery. Subsequently, Dusenbery filed a motion for return of this property, arguing he had not received notice of the forfeitures and was thus denied due process of law. Judge Bell of this Court denied Dusenbery’s motion, but the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded. 1
The government now moves for summary judgment on the ultimate question of the propriety of the forfeitures (docket no. 557). For…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Real Prop. in Section 9/otsego Cty., MiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- United States v. Twenty Thousand Three Hundred & Ninety Two Dollars in United States Currency ($20,392.00)District Court, Virgin Islands · 2008