Legal Opinion

United States v. Real Prop. in Section 9/otsego Cty., Mi

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 23, 2004No. 87-10338-BCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE AS TO CLAIMANTS DANIEL AND MICHAEL GAHA-GAN AND AS TO CLAIMANT AGNES RIDDLE-GAHAGAN, DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY CLAIMANTS DANIEL AND MICHAEL GAHAGAN AND BY CLAIMANT AGNES RIDDLE-GAHAGAN, DENYING MOTION BY CLAIMANT DANIEL GAHAGAN FOR RELEASE FROM ARREST, DENYING MOTION BY CLAIMANT DANIEL GAHAGAN FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO THE EXCESSIVE FINES CLAUSE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, DENYING MOTION BY CLAIMANT DANIEL GA-HAGAN FOR COMPENSATION FOR SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE, AND DENYING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Van NguyenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. $52,000.00, More or Less, in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
  3. United States v. 40 Acres of Real Property, More or LessDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API