Petersen v. Federated Development Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Memorandum
HAIGHT, District Judge.
The defendants have brought a motion for summary judgment directed at the two remaining counts of plaintiff’s second amended complaint. Previously, by Memo randum of Judge Bonsai dated November 26, 1974 and reported at 387 F.Supp. 355 (S.D.N.Y.1975), and Order dated December 20, 1974, plaintiffs three other causes of action were dismissed on the pleadings, and his motions for class certification and appointment of a receiver denied. In opposing the instant motion, plaintiff also seeks “reinstatement” of the dismissed portions of his suit on…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Casco Bay Lines, Inc.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1982
- Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1978
- Hurwitz v. R. B. Jones Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1977
- Timms v. RosenblumDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Kamerman v. SteinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.