Legal Opinion
Kamerman v. Steinberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 9, 1986No. Nos. 84 Civ. 4440(CBM), 84 Civ. 4550(CBM), 84 Civ. 4654(CBM) and 84 Civ. 4665(CBM)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION MOTLEY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Norman Kamerman, Barnett Stepak, Shirley Brown Edward Rosen, Lex*513im Investors Corp. and Dosha Anstalt Corp. have brought these actions against defendants, Saul Steinberg, Reliance Group Holdings, Reliance Financial Services Corp., and Reliance Insurance Company, (The “Reliance Defendants”), alleging that defendants violated Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with their purchase of shares of stock of Disney Corporation in the period between March 29 and June 11, 1984.1 Plaintiffs allege that defendants made a material…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Greenspan v. BrasslerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Kamerman v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Kamerman v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Koenig v. BensonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Kamerman v. SteinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.