Legal Opinion
Julio Cisternas-Estay and Doris Cisternas-Estay v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 14, 1976No. 75--1261PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
Cisternas-Estay petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing an appeal of Cisternas-Estay and his wife, in which it was contended that they were entitled to suspension of deportation under section 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h). Four issues of law present themselves. The first goes to the applicability of the Administrative Procedure Act of 1966, (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 500 et seq., to the review by the Board of a section 242 deportation determination. The second concerns…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Chung Young Chew v. John P. Boyd, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice, Seattle DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Procio Rivero Pilapil v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Garnett BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Giuseppe Giambanco v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Miguel Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Jagdish Rai Chadha v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Ka Fung Chan v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Erskine Alleyne v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.