United States v. Zinn & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7221 (T. D. 31587).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The merchandise, imported during the month of October, 1909, consisted of certain baskets composed of straw, willow, rattan, and *420wood. All of such, baskets were colored or stained, and were in each instance lined and padded with silk. An. analysis of the original material of which the basket as thus lined was composed showed the chief value of the raw material to be silk. It does not appear that ' the value of the lining exceeded that of the finished basket. The appraiser returned these baskets as “manufactures of straw, wood, grass, cotton, and silk.” They were assessed for duty as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Krauss & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Thomsen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Brody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Blumenthal & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Morimura Bros v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- United States v. MulhensCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Menchaca v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.