United States v. Mulhens
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Apreal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7441 (T. D. 83241).
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
Two different kinds of merchandise are involved in this case. One, an empty glass bottle covered on the outside with willow strands, sometimes referred to as wicker, closely woven around the bottle and tightly drawn, so that none of the glass is visible except about one-half inch at the top. The bottle can not be withdrawn from the willow without destroying or unweaving it. A representative sample of this merchandise is before us. No sample of the other is presented, but it is agreed that it is like the one mentioned, except that it has a metal top. In each case the merchandise was returned…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Zinn & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Hempstead v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
- Woodruff v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hensel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Morimura Bros v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- United States v. SassiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Protest 952457-G of Ore & Chemical Corp.United States Customs Court · 1939
- Protests 36018-K of Advertising Corp. of AmericaUnited States Customs Court · 1944