Legal Opinion

In Re Johnson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2010No. 09-BG-1086, 09-BG-1088Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On further consideration of the certified copy of the disciplinary orders issued by the Maryland Court of Appeals disbarring respondents, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Renard Johnson and Will Purcell, 409 Md. 470, 976 A.2d 245 (2009), this court’s September 16, 2009, and September 18, 2009, orders suspending respondents from the practice of law pending final disposition by this court, and directing respondents to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the responses thereto, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding recip- roeal discipline, and it…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In Re SumnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. In Re MeislerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. In Re McGowanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API