Legal Opinion · Dissent

Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1999No. WCB 95-08576; CA A97325Published

1DissentDe Muniz, J.

In 1995, the Oregon Legislature amended ORS 656.283(7) to limit the evidence that may be considered by an administrative law judge (ALJ) to evidence submitted at the reconsideration phase of the claim determination process. Claimant contends that the amended statute denies due process to workers seeking permanent total disability (PTD) benefits because there is no meaningful opportunity, at any point in the claim determination process, to present live testimony or rebuttal evidence or to cross-examine witnesses. The majority appears to hold that due process is satisfied because, in its view,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Carr v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API