State v. Andrews
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
*195Defendant appeals an amended general judgment of conviction for harassment, ORS 166.065.1 We reject without discussion defendant's first assignment of error and write to address his second assignment, which challenges the trial court's award of restitution. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.
When reviewing a trial court's award of restitution, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, State v. Kirkland , 268 Or. App. 420, 421, 342 P.3d 163 (2015), and review a trial court's legal conclusions for errors of law, State v. Jordan , 249 Or. App. 93, 96, 274 P.3d 289,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. SeggermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AndrewsOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. RiekensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. StormCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022