Legal Opinion
Anschutz Corp. v. MERRILL LYNCH AND CO. INC.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 27, 2011No. C 09-03780 SIPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND STRIKE
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are defendant Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.’s motions to dismiss and to strike, defendants Rating Agencies’ motion to dismiss and defendant Fitch Ltd.’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Dkt. ## 122, 125, 127 and 131.) Based on the pleadings submitted and arguments made, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part DBSI’s motion to dismiss; DENIES DBSI’s motion to strike; DENIES the Rating Agencies’ motion to dismiss; and GRANTS Fitch Ltd.’s motion to dismiss.
BACKGROUND
1.…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Anschutz Corp. v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund v. Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Genesee County Employees' Retirement System v. Thornburg Mortgage Securities TrustDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Piping Rock Partners, Inc. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Mazuma Holding Corp. v. BethkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.