Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1985No. 14613Published

1DissentTapken, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the holding of the majority opinion.

The right to effective legal representation is guaranteed at every critical stage of a criminal proceeding, including appeal. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant desired to appeal his conviction of forgery and his court-appointed appellate counsel was aware of that decision. Counsel failed to file the notice of appeal with the clerk of courts as required by SDCL 23A-32-16, but rather stated he sent it to the court reporter with instructions to file the notice for him.

In Grooms v.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Richard E. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API