Stuart v. Bank of Staplehurst
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Seward county. Tried below before Bates, J. It was the duty of the state court, upon the filing of the petition and bond, to proceed no further in the cause. (Stevens v. Phoenix Ins. Go., 41 N. Y. 149; Shaft v. Phomix Mutual Life Ins. Go., 67 N. Y.’544; Stale v. Goosaio Mining Go., 45 Fed. Rep. 804; Torrent v. Martin Lumber Go., 37 Fed. Rep. 727; Clark v. Chicago, M. & S. P. R. Go., 11 Fed.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Seward county. Tried below before Bates, J. It was the duty of the state court, upon the filing of the petition and bond, to proceed no further in the cause. (Stevens v. Phoenix Ins. Go., 41 N. Y. 149; Shaft v. Phomix Mutual Life Ins. Go., 67 N. Y.’544; Stale v. Goosaio Mining Go., 45 Fed. Rep. 804; Torrent v. Martin Lumber Go., 37 Fed. Rep. 727; Clark v. Chicago, M. & S. P. R. Go., 11 Fed. Rep. 355; Sioect v. Chicago, M. & S. P. R. Go., 11 Fed. Rep. 355; Hatch v. Chicago, R. I. cG P. R. Co., 6 Blatch. [U. S.] 105.) The question of jurisdiction belongs to the…
1Opinion of the Court
Harrison, O. J.
The defendant in error instituted this action in the district court of Seward county and alleged for cause that the plaintiff in error and parties avIio Avere co-defendants were at the times of the occurrences upon which the suit was predicated, directors of a national bank, in the business which its name indicates, in the city of Lincoln, and at various stated times mad'3 and published, or caused them to be published, in newspapers of general circulation in said city, and in the state of Nebraska, certain false statements of fact of and concerning the bank of Avhich they…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Stone v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- City of Chicago v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Chappell v. WaterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Green v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Hartman v. HartmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Yates v. Jones National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- MacDonald v. RoethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.