Legal Opinion

Yates v. Jones National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1905No. Nos. 13,030, 13,031, 13,032, 13,033PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the district court for Seward county: Samuel H. Sornborger, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C.

In 1893 the Jones National Bank and the Bank of Staplehurst each brought an action against Charles W. Mosher, Homer E. Walsh, David E. Thompson, Charles E. Yates, Ellis P. Hamer, Ambrose P. S. Stuart, Richard C. Outcalt and Rollo O. Phillips; and Thomas Bailey and the Utica Bank each brought an action against all of tlio said defendants except David E. Thompson. The actions were brought in the district court for Lancaster county, and the several petitions, so far as the present inquiry is concerned, as substantially the same, and the allegations are, in effect, as follows: That from…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Bissell v. Spring Valley TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Foley v. HoltryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hughes v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Fuchs v. Parsons Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Clark v. Lincoln Liberty Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Knapp v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Trainor v. Maverick Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API