Legal Opinion
Geo. C. Vaughan & Sons v. Harrisburg Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 20, 1946No. 11786PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CODY, Justice.
The principal question involved in this appeal is whether the court erred in directing a verdict for appellee at the conclusion of plaintiff’s (appellant’s) evidence.
On May 23, 1941, a writ of garnishment after judgment was served on appellee Bank to subject the funds of Claude M. Barter, doing business as “Rig-A-Lite”, to the payment of a judgment for $728.88, which had been obtained on April 17, 1941. The Bank seasonably filed its answer in which it denied it owned any indebtedness to Claude M. Barter, doing business as “Rig-A-Lite”. The appellant, being the' plaintiff in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Creosoted Wood Block Paving Co. v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Haggerty v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1860
- Venting v. CarriganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Thompson v. Fulton Bag & Cotton MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. KluttsNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- Harrisburg Nat. Bank v. Geo. C. Vaughan & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947