Legal Opinion
Spinedex Physical Therapy USA, Inc. v. United Healthcare of Arizona, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 29, 2009No. CV-08-457-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
On July 9, 2008, Plaintiffs Claude Aragon, Jack Adams, Spinedex Physical Therapy USA, Inc. (“Spinedex”) and the Arizona Chiropractic Society (“ACS”) filed a Second Amended Complaint, alleging a class action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) (Doc. 38). Aragon and Adams are participants or beneficiaries in, and thus receive health insurance from, one of the Plans and allege wrongful denial of benefits. 1 Spinedex is a medical practice which provided health care services to Aragon, Adams and other Plan participants…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re WellPoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Beaston v. Sundt CompaniesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011