Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McKenzie

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1990No. 2016PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Danny McKenzie was tried by jury and was found guilty of three counts of aggravated assault and one count of possessing an instrument of crime as a result of his spraying shots from an Uzi automatic rifle around a Philadelphia street on the evening of July 29, 1988. Post-trial motions were denied, and McKenzie was given a sentence of imprisonment for aggravated assault and a period of probation for possession of an instrument of crime. On direct appeal, his principal argument is that the trial court erred when, over objection, it quashed a defense subpoena for Robin Watkins,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. LahoudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DourisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Com. v. Baxter, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Garland, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Logan, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API