Commonwealth v. Douris
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, J.:
¶ 1 James Douris appeals his conviction for harassment. We affirm his conviction but reverse the award of attorney’s fees.
¶ 2 After a district justice convicted appellant of harassment, appellant appealed to the trial court. See Trial Court Opinion Pursuant to PA. Rule of Appellate Procedure 1925 (“Trial Court Opinion”), 3/29/00, at 1. Judge Ward F. Clark heard the matter de novo on November 23, 1999, and found appellant guilty. See id. Judge Clark found the following facts:
For three years, Marie Costello worked for the Department of Human Resources on the sixth floor of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Warehime v. ARWCO Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- Douris v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Com. v. Logan, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Merceir, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Miller, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016