Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Castano

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 15, 2000No. Record 992478PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

In this appeal, we consider whether the circuit court erred by denying the plaintiff’s motion to amend his motions for judgment to increase each ad damnum clause.

Plaintiff, Emery C. Peterson, was injured in a motor vehicle accident in Alexandria on April 10, 1996. He filed a motion for judgment against Lorenzo M. Castaño and his employer, El Mercado, Inc., and alleged that Castano’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle was a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries. The plaintiff also filed a separate motion for judgment against another driver of a motor vehicle involved in the same…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mortarino v. Consultant Engineering Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  2. Adkins v. DixonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  3. Hetland v. Worcester Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  4. Brown v. Brown by BeachamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Drewery v. City of RoanokeRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2001
  2. Booher v. Botetourt County Board of SupervisorsBotetourt County Circuit Court · 2004
  3. Khan v. WashingtonAlexandria County Circuit Court · 2007
  4. Whitaker v. Heinrich Schepers GMBH & Co. KGSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  5. XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API