Legal Opinion

Saskatchewan Mutual Insurance Co. v. CE Design, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 26, 2017No. 15-3332PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Saskatchewan Mutual Insurance (SMI) is trying to enforce a Canadian judgment against CE Design in federal court. That judgment resulted from CE Design’s unsuccessful effort to enforce an earlier Illinois judgment against SMI in Saskatchewan. The question before us is whether the federal courts—the third set of tribunals that have played host to this decade-long legal battle—have jurisdiction over the latest round. We conclude that the answer is no—an outcome that is especially appropriate given the comity concerns that pervade this litigation.

I

CE Design is an Illinois…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Fishers, Indiana v. DIRECTTVCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. Adams v. Eagle Road Oil LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  3. CITY OF FISHERS, INDIANA v. NETFLIX, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
  4. Ferrero U.S.A., Inc. v. ErcoliDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Gwinnett County, Georgia v. Netflix, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API