Legal Opinion

Richard Rogel v. Max Dubrinsky

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2009No. 08-1942UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Frederic Keywell appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Richard Rogel. Rogel sued Keywell and Mark Dubrinsky (who is now deceased and whose estate has not appealed) under Michigan common law for contribution of their pro rata shares of a debt that each of them had guaranteed but that Rogel repaid on his own. The debt at issue was incurred by Executive Hotel Group, LLC (“Executive”), a Michigan corporation the three men formed through their own intermediate business entities. Executive was governed by an Operating…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gledhill v. Fisher & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ComSpec International, Inc.v. Uniface B.V.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  2. Jones v. WolfDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API