Legal Opinion

Hightower v. Hightower

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1987No. 8612DC932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the court erred in failing to conclude that plaintiffs increase in income, coupled with defendant’s own plans to remarry, justified a decrease in the amount of alimony he is required to pay. We disagree.

Upon a showing of changed circumstances, an order for alimony may be modified at any time. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-16.9(a). However, the change must be substantial, and the moving party has the burden of proving that the award is either inadequate or unduly burdensome. Medlin v. Medlin, 64 N.C. App. 600, 307 S.E. 2d 591 (1983). In the original order, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beaman v. BeamanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Medlin v. MedlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Condie v. CondieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morris v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. In re J.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Matter of BullaboughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Stachlowski v. StachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API