Legal Opinion

Condie v. Condie

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1981No. 8014DC815PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff contends, based upon his first assignment of error, that the court erred in denying his motions for a directed verdict with respect to defendant’s counterclaim. He argues that the evidence presented is insufficient to show abandonment of defendant by plaintiff, but does sufficiently show separation by consent. We do not agree.

One spouse abandons the other spouse, within the meaning of the statute establishing abandonment as one of the grounds entitling a dependent spouse to alimony (G.S. § 50-16.2), where the spouse brings the cohabitation to an end without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Panhorst v. PanhorstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Joyner v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re J.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Matter of AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Whedon v. WhedonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Beaman v. BeamanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Hightower v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API