Legal Opinion

People v. Laster

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1997No. E016226PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

Defendants Ventrice (Vince) Lajuan Laster and Frederick Hayes (collectively defendants) were convicted on four counts of deliberate and premeditated attempted murder arising out of a drive-by shooting. Defendant Laster admittedly drove the car. Defendant Hayes admittedly was the passenger; the prosecution claimed Hayes was also the shooter. Defendants, however, claimed the shooting was the unplanned and unforeseen act of one of two mysterious passengers in the back seat. The prosecution accordingly argued that, even if neither defendant was the shooter, they were both liable…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Juan H. v. Walter Allen IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. AtkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. VerlindeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API