Legal Opinion

Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy Dist. v. Peters

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1945No. 4878PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The question for decision is whether an artesian conservancy district organized under the provisions of L. 1931, c. 97 (1941 Comp., Art. 13, c. 77) is authorized to maintain a suit to enjoin the use of water taken from an artesian well drilled on land located outside the exterior boundaries of the district but alleged to be supplied by the artesian basin underlying the lands within the territorial boundaries of the district to the detriment of the water users of the district.

As filed the complaint upon which the hearing was had joined as co-plaintiffs five landowners, each of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Yeo v. TweedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Savage v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Caviness v. La Grande Irr. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Oregon Construction Co. v. Allen Ditch Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  2. City of Albuquerque v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Erickson v. McLeanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. MendenhallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. LewisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API