Legal Opinion

Lavender v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 23, 1988No. 87-188PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issues presented by this appeal are whether the notice sent by AmSouth Bank to William Lavender complies with the requirements of § 7-9-504(3), Code of Alabama (1975); and, if it does not, whether AmSouth was barred from recovering a judgment for the deficiency on a promissory note secured by a security agreement on certain logging equipment after the sale of that equipment by AmSouth. AmSouth lent Mr. Lavender $20,513.18 to refinance certain equipment1 he used in his logging business. Mr. Lavender signed a promissory note and a security agreement, using the logging equipment as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. Atlas Shirt Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  2. Valley Min. Corp., Inc. v. Metro BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Simmons MacH. Co. Inc. v. M. & M Brokerage, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Wells v. Central Bank of Alabama, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Davis v. Huntsville Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Beard v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Greene v. Associates (In Re Green)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
  4. Daniel v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Cherry v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In re Cherry)District Court, D. Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API