Legal Opinion

Amador County v. United States Department of the Interior

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 2, 2014No. 13-5245PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge:

In 2005, Amador County, California brought suit against the Department of Interior challenging the Secretary’s approval of a gaming compact between the Buena Vista Ranchería of Me-Wuk Indians (the “Tribe”) and the State of California. After nearly six-and-a-half years of litigation, the Tribe sought to intervene for the limited purpose of moving to dismiss the amended complaint finder Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19. The district court denied…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Roeder v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Dimond v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. James Owens v. Republic of SudanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Shabtai Shatsky v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  3. Jose Vasquez v. DCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
  4. Campaign Legal Center v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
  5. Amador County, California v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API