Legal Opinion

Amador County, California v. Kempthorne

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 16, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2005-0658PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING THE UNITED STATES’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, United States District Court Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

At the center of this dispute is a proposed gaming operation on the Buena Vista Ranchería of the Me-Wuk Tribe located in Amador County, California. In 2000, pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory-Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721, the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (the “Secretary”), approved a gaming compact between the Me-Wuk Tribe and the State of California. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunitySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Sierra Club v. MainellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amador County v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API