Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. McManus

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 11, 1997No. 965734PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

The plaintiff, Exxon Corporation (Exxon), seeks specific performance of an option to purchase real estate contained in a lease of real property in Waltham, Massachusetts. Exxon entered into the lease in 1971 with the predecessors in title to the defendant, M. Claire McManus, (McManus) who is the current property owner.1 McManus contends that because the option to purchase vests more than twenty-one years after its creation, it violates the rule against perpetuities and is therefore void.

The case is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. There are no disputed issues of fact,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Keogh v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Eastman Marble Co. v. Vermont Marble Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Hollander v. Central Metal & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  4. Raynor v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Dozier v. Troy Drive-In-Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. CohanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API