Scrivner v. Dietz
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Alameda, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. .
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
Action for foreclosure of mortgage. Decree for plaintiff, from which the defendant, Dietz, holding under a conveyance subsequent to the mortgage, appeals. The ease comes up on the judgment roll.
*296The only question in the case is, whether the mortgage lien was extinguished by merger into the legal title.
The facts, briefly stated, are: The entire tract covered by the mortgage was conveyed by Blaise to Grant for the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars. Of this sum six thousand dollars was paid down, and a deed executed and placed in escrow, to be delivered upon payment of the balance. Before the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Carpentier v. BrenhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Rumpp v. GerkensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Brooks v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Price v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gray v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. FieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bixby v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Ex Rel. Cameron v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1924
- Cohn v. GooddayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.