Legal Opinion

Scrivner v. Dietz

California Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1890No. 12750PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Alameda, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. .

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Action for foreclosure of mortgage. Decree for plaintiff, from which the defendant, Dietz, holding under a conveyance subsequent to the mortgage, appeals. The ease comes up on the judgment roll.

*296The only question in the case is, whether the mortgage lien was extinguished by merger into the legal title.

The facts, briefly stated, are: The entire tract covered by the mortgage was conveyed by Blaise to Grant for the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars. Of this sum six thousand dollars was paid down, and a deed executed and placed in escrow, to be delivered upon payment of the balance. Before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Carpentier v. BrenhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Rumpp v. GerkensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Brooks v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Price v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gray v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. FieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bixby v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Ex Rel. Cameron v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Cohn v. GooddayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API