Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Maislin Transport Ltd.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1983No. 1360PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

This case presents the issue of whether an order precluding defendants from entering any defense at trial as to plaintiffs claim, where unverified answers to interrogatories have already been delivered to plaintiff, constitutes an abuse of discretion as an inappropriate sanction under Pa.R. C.P. 4019. Because our review of the facts leads to the conclusion that the sanction here imposed was unwarranted, we reverse and remand.

This action, involving damage claims for both personal injury and property loss, arose out of a collision between plaintiffs 1976 Lincoln automobile and a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Pompa v. HojnackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Jerry Pitell Co. v. Penn State Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brunetti v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Feingold v. Philadelphia National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Marshall v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Weist v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commercial Trading Co. v. Milsan Mills Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API