Legal Opinion

Weist v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1988No. 0649PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This appeal concerns a trial court order imposing sanctions against appellant Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”). The action was commenced on December 10, 1985 by appellee filing a complaint in assumpsit averring ARCO breached its contract with appellee by charging him $18,203 in alleged royalty deficiencies without justification pursuant to an am/pm Mini Market agreement between the parties. In its answer, filed February 13, 1986, ARCO denied any overcharge and averred it was entitled to the money for deficiencies during the auditing period. Arco also raised a number of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Hoffman v. Memorial Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Pompa v. HojnackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grunde v. HuffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Cohen, M. v. Moore Becker, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Euceda v. Green, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2014
  4. Lawrysh v. United Van Lines, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1990
  5. Schmidt, R. v. LeBoon, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API