Legal Opinion

Turman v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 18, 1921No. 10266PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Seminole County; J. W. Bolen, Judge. Action for possession of land by Mark Ingram against Thomas and Rhoda Turman. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtPitohford, J.

Mark Ingram, the defendant in error, plaintiff below, filed this action in the district court of Seminole county, Oklahoma, on the 16th day of March, 1910, against Thomas and Rhoda Turman, as defendants, for the possession of lot four (4) and five (5)', and the west 7.16 acres of lot one (1), section twenty-nine (29), township nine (9) north, range eight (8) east, located in said county. Plaintiff and defendants de-raigned title from the allottee, Toby Bartlett, a Creek freedman; the plaintiff claiming under a deed executed by the allottee, under date of April 22, 1904; the defendants, under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Lowenstein v. SextonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Dawson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Blanchard v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Davenport v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cochran v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Treese v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Westerheide v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Cheney v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Felt v. SchaubSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API