Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Wolf

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1916No. 6588PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; John Carutheys, Judge. Action by Freeland Wolf against I-t. G. Davenport. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant named brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAY, C.

Freeland Wolf, plaintiff below, instituted this action in the trial court against It. G. Davenport, defendant below, and the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff’s action was to quiet title to certain lands, the same being his surplus allotment, and the petition, among other things, alleged that plaintiff was in possession and the legal and equitable owner of said lands.

Defendant answered, denying plaintiff’s possession and ownership, and also filed a cross-petition in whieh, among other things, he alleged that at the time of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Radcliffe v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Sanders v. Village of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  3. Siedschlag v. GriffinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Watson v. CrutcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  5. Mollie v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gafford v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Terwilleger v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Bridwell v. GoeskeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  5. Hill v. Turnverein Germania of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API