Legal Opinion

Strachan v. Sheedy

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 15, 2001No. 004831CPublished

1Opinion of the CourtHinkle, J.

On February 12, 2000, this matter was before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaim for abuse of process.3 Plaintiffs argue that the counterclaim should be dismissed because the filing of this case and the obtaining of a lis pendens does not constitute an abuse of process.

For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

On September 29, 2000, defendant Laura Sheedy and Robert Cunningham, Trustee, signed plaintiffs offer to purchase Sheedy’s property at 11 Harrington Road in Lexington. The offer stated that it was “subject to mutually…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Blank v. Chelmsford Ob/Gyn, P.C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Jones v. Brockton Public Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API