Legal Opinion

Blank v. Chelmsford Ob/Gyn, P.C.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 17, 1995PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The individual defendants, two of the three shareholders in a close corporation, terminated the employment of the plaintiff, the third shareholder, pursuant to an *405employment agreement. As a result of this termination, the plaintiff filed this action alleging that the individual defendants were liable on theories of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and unfair and deceptive trade acts in violation of G. L. c. 93A (1992 ed.). The plaintiff also alleged that the defendant corporation was liable on theories of breach of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. City of Midland v. O'BRYANTTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Warner-Lambert Co. v. Execuquest Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Kattar v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Chokel v. Genzyme Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API