Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Stevens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 10, 1993No. 398A92PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

This case brings to the Court a question involving aggregating or stacking underinsured motorist coverages in several automobile policies. The question of stacking uninsured and underinsured motorist coverages has been a fruitful source of litigation. See Lanning v. Allstate Insurance Co., 332 N.C. 309, 420 S.E.2d 180 (1992); Harris v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 332 N.C. 184, 420 S.E.2d 124 (1992); Bass v. N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 332 N.C. 109, 418 S.E.2d 221 (1992); Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 328 N.C. 139, 400 S.E.2d 44 (1991); Sutton v. Aetna Casualty and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Crowder v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Harris v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Bass v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Miller v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Onley v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Benton v. HanfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Wiggins v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API