Legal Opinion

State v. Jack Cahill Steelsmith, Jr.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2012No. 39037PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Jack Cahill Steelsmith, Jr. appeals from his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol and from certain post-judgment orders. Steelsmith asserts that the district court did not have authority at the end of a period of retained jurisdiction to add to his sentence by imposing a fine and court costs and suspending his driver’s license. Steel-smith also asserts that the district court abused its discretion by relinquishing jurisdiction and by denying his Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion to reduce his sentence. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

BACKGROUND

Steelsmith…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. State v. HuffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. KnightonIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Jose Luis VillavicencioIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. Michel J. WalkerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. Michelle Alece MaceIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. GuzmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. Jose Luis VillavicencioIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API