Legal Opinion

State v. Jose Luis Villavicencio

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2015No. 42198PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge Pro Tem.

Jose Luis Villavieencio was charged with and convicted of multiple offenses. He entered into a binding plea agreement requiring ten-year periods of probation. The court imposed ten-year probation terms but did so in a manner that conflicted with the applicable statutes. Villavieencio filed a motion to cure his illegal sentences, and it was granted. The court reduced his probation to legal terms, but those sentences were inconsistent with the plea agreement. The State appeals and argues that the court erred by imposing amended sentences that do not comply with the plea…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. JakoskiIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. PedrazaIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. MoneyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. MendenhallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BarrIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. DunneIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API