Legal Opinion

Rosman v. Cuevas

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided December 8, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 9885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHuls, J.

Respondent sued appellant and her husband and had judgment against her for a balance due on a conditional sales contract for the purchase of an automobile. At the, trial, counsel stipulated that the contract had been executed between her husband and appellant as buyers and the automobile seller, who was. plaintiff's assignor. Appellant answered by a general denial and an affirmative defense that at the time of entering into the contract, appellant lacked capacity to contract, having lost her civil rights upon her conviction of a felony. The sole issue is whether appellant had capacity to make…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Estate of BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Schoenung v. GalletWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Tevis v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosman v. CuevasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API