Rosman v. Cuevas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
176 Cal.App.2d Supp. 867 (1959)
1 Cal. Rptr. 485
GEORGE ROSMAN, Respondent,
v.
RICHARD CUEVAS et al., Defendants; PATTI CUEVAS, Appellant.
Docket No. 9885.
Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.
December 8, 1959.
Warren G. Day and Robert E. Atkinson for Appellant.
George L. Beckwith, Frank L. Schmehr and Richard C. Wulliger for Respondent.
HULS, J.
Respondent sued appellant and her husband and had judgment against her for a balance due on a conditional sales contract for the purchase of an automobile. At the trial, counsel stipulated that the contract had been…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Estate of BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Schoenung v. GalletWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Tevis v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960