Legal Opinion
Duluth St. Ry. Co. v. Railroad and Warehouse Commission
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 27, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, District Judge.
The above-entitled cause eame regularly on for hearing upon exceptions to the report of the special master heretofore appointed in said cause. The suit is one brought to enjoin the enforcement of an order of the Railroad and Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota, fixing rates to be charged by plaintiff in the city of Duluth.
At the outset the contention is again made by the defendants that the suit is premature. This question was passed upon at an earlier stage in this case and it is not necessary to discuss it here at length. The conclusions heretofore reached…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hammerstrom v. Toy Nat. Bank of Sioux CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Ellis v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Madden Bros. v. Railroad & Warehouse Commission of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1930
- Pok v. ZBS Law LLPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025