Legal Opinion
Pok v. ZBS Law LLP
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 21, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01084Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RATTANA POK, et al., No. 2:25-cv-01084-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 14 ZBS LAW, LLP, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiffs in this matter have moved to temporarily restrain all foreclosure 19 proceedings, including a foreclosure sale, against their home, arguing the foreclosure 20 arises out of a fraudulently procured deed of trust securing a home equity line of 21 credit that Plaintiffs “neither applied for, executed, nor received.” As evidence of this 22 claim,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador Laurel, Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador LaurelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.